Rastriya Swatantra Party (RSP) Chair Rabi Lamichhane said in Bharatpur, Chitwan, on November 5, 2026, that policy should reach across the country rather than remain limited to an individual representative or his own constituency. His remarks placed the emphasis on nationwide policy reach, rather than on the presence or influence of a particular person in one electoral area.

A call for nationwide policy reach

Lamichhane’s central point was that policy should extend throughout the country. As reported, he contrasted that national reach with an approach in which policy is confined to his own constituency. The statement framed policy as something that should not be restricted to the location represented by one individual.

The distinction in his remarks was between the reach of policy and the role of an individual representative. Rather than presenting his constituency as the limit of the policy’s scope, Lamichhane said the policy itself should extend nationwide. The reported comments did not identify a specific policy, programme or government decision, so the remarks were about the intended reach of policy in general.

Remarks made in Bharatpur

Lamichhane made the comments in Bharatpur, in Chitwan. Reports published by OnlineKhabar and Gorkhapatra Online on November 5 carried the same core message: policy should reach across the country and should not be confined to his constituency. The available accounts identify the place and date of the remarks but do not provide further detail about the occasion on which he spoke.

The reported statement also did not specify how nationwide policy reach should be achieved, or name particular areas or communities that should be covered. Its focus was the principle that policy should extend beyond an individual representative’s constituency. Lamichhane’s comment therefore presented national reach as the measure he wanted the policy to have, rather than treating a local constituency as its endpoint.

Individual representation and policy

The remarks distinguish between a representative and the policy associated with that representative. Lamichhane’s point, as reported, was not that policy should be limited to the area of a person’s political representation; instead, it should extend across the country. This puts the emphasis on the broader reach of policy, rather than on an individual’s constituency alone.

No specific policy details or implementation proposals were included in the reports summarized here. Lamichhane’s statement is therefore best understood as a general position on the geographic scope of policy, rather than as an announcement of a particular measure. The reported remarks do not indicate whether he was referring to a named RSP policy or a wider policy principle.

Both reports carried the same central message from the Bharatpur remarks: policy should reach nationwide, not be confined to an individual or a single constituency. Lamichhane’s comments made that distinction the focus of his statement, without identifying a specific policy or outlining further steps.